Tourism minister apologizes for gaffes

New tourism minister Nariaki Nakayama wasted no time putting his foot in it. The day after stating that Japanese do not like foreigners and that the country is ethnically homogeneous, Nakayama apologized Friday and retracted his statements.

“I am sorry for having caused trouble to the people,” the land, infrastructure, transport and tourism minister told a news conference. “I retract my remarks that I think fell too short (of an explanation) or went too far.”

Nakayama, who took up his post on Wednesday, added that he had no intention of resigning to take responsibility for his remarks.

Nakayama’s gaffe comes just ahead of the Oct. 1 launch of a tourism agency charged with drawing 10 million foreign visitors to the country by 2010.

Asked how more foreign travelers might be enticed to come to Japan in the face of opposition from some locals, Nakayama responded, “Definitely, (Japanese) do not like or desire foreigners.”

He added that Japan is extremely inward-looking and “ethnically homogeneous.”

However, he also said it is important for Japanese to open up the nation and their minds to welcome foreign travelers.

Nakayama is not the first politician to land in hot water for referring to Japan as a homogeneous nation. When in 1986 then Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone described Japan as a nation with a homogeneous race, he was met with a strong backlash mainly from the Ainu, an aboriginal people from north Japan.

Yukio Hatoyama, secretary general of the Democratic Party of Japan, called Nakayama’s remarks on homogeneity Thursday extremely rude and told reporters he “needs to give up his post, not the remarks.”

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20080927a2.html

Gaffes by minister put Aso in a bind

Barely 48 hours into the new administration, Prime Minister Taro Aso was facing his first crisis Friday with calls for the dismissal of transport minister Nariaki Nakayama over a stream of verbal gaffes.

When asked about what Japan should do to promote tourism, Nakayama said, “Japan is a very inward-looking nation, you could say it is a homogeneous race.”

While in itself not particularly shocking, the remark seemed to deny the existence of ethnic Chinese and Koreans in Japan, among others.

A similar comment by then Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone in 1986 led to protests from Ainu groups.

On Friday, Nakayama was forced to retract his comments.

“Since this is the first time I am working in the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, there were many things I did not understand,” Nakayama said.

http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200809260354.html

Will open-door immigration plan die after Fukuda?

The hope was provided by a group of lawmakers from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party who drafted a bold proposal to create a new immigration policy that would raise the population of foreigners in Japan to 10 percent of the overall population in the next 50 years.

The proposal was handed to Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda, but his sudden resignation announcement Sept. 1 is raising concerns the proposal will be buried by the next prime minister.

“I am disappointed,” said lawmaker Hirohiko Nakamura, who helped draft the proposal. In a recent interview with The Japan Times, Nakamura said Fukuda was instrumental in getting the proposal off the ground.

“We got this far because it was Fukuda. . . . Fukuda was willing to listen to the proposal and it was about to move forward.”

Japan’s immigration policy largely depends on its leader, but when the prime minister keeps changing, consistency goes out the window.

The group’s report is titled “Proposal For a Japanese-style Immigration Policy.” It aims to address the problem of Japan’s shrinking population by raising the number of foreign residents. Nakamura was secretary general of team, which was was chaired by former LDP Secretary General Hidenao Nakagawa.

“The only effective treatment to save Japan from a population crisis is to accept people from abroad,” the proposal says. “For Japan to survive, it needs to open its doors as an international state passable to the world and shift toward establishing an ‘immigrant nation’ by accepting immigrants and revitalizing Japan.”

The group’s definition of “immigrant” is consistent with that of the United Nations: individuals who have lived outside their home countries for more than 12 months. This includes people on state or corporate training programs, exchange students and asylum seekers.

One major aspect of the proposal, Nakamura explained, is protecting the rights of foreigners in Japan so they can work safely and securely.

“Japanese people are pretending not to see the human rights situation of foreign laborers,” Nakamura said. “In a world where even animal rights are protected, how can we ignore the human rights of foreign workers?”

“What are politicians doing to solve this problem?” Nakamura asked. “They are at the beck and call of the bureaucrats who are just trying to protect their vested interests.”

Nakamura faulted the bureaucrats for not creating a warmer society for foreigners. For example, they don’t bring up the poor labor conditions for foreign workers, but when a foreigner is suspected of a crime, the information is spread immediately, Nakamura said.

“Bureaucrats don’t want (many foreigners in Japan),” Nakamura said. “Otherwise, it would be so easy (for bureaucrats) to start an educational campaign on living symbiotically with foreigners.”

Admitting that lawmakers have also dragged their feet, Nakamura said the key to breaking the vertically structured bureaucrat-led administration is to establish an official “immigration agency” to unify the handling of foreigner-related affairs, including legal issues related to nationality and immigration control.

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20080919f2.html

Number of foreign workers at Japanese firms leaps over previous figures

Back in March of 2007, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare reported that the number of foreigners working at Japanese firms had hit a record high of 222,929 at the end of May 2006. Looking at the growth in figures at the time, it seemed reasonable to assume that the number of foreigners working at Japanese companies would hit the 250,00 mark sometime in mid-2008.

However, according to a report released by the ministry last week, the number of foreigners working at Japanese companies as of June 30, 2008 has hit 338,813. This is obviously a massive increase on what was seen in 2006, and MHLW has an explanation for that. The survey method itself has changed a bit, as the Japanese government now requires all firms with foreign employees to report their name, nationality and visa status to the ministry whenever a hiring or dismissal takes place.

We will most likely see a further boost in these numbers, as compliance with the new rules does not take total effect until October 1. At any rate, the figure show that 44.2% of foreign workers at Japanese firms are from China (149,876), 20.9% are from Brazil (70,809), 12.4% are listed as ?other? (42,046), 8.3% are from the Philippines (28,134), 7.1% are from the G8 plus Australia and New Zealand (24,210), and 3.9% are from Korea (13,106). In the case of Korea, ?? is the kanji used, which implies that special permanent residents are excluded from this survey. Finally, 3.1% of the workers hail from Peru (10,632).

Of the 338,813 foreign workers in Japan, 120,601, or 35.6%, are listed as being heads of household who hold contract worker or temporary worker status.

http://www.japaneconomynews.com/2008/09/13/number-of-foreign-workers-at-japanese-firms-leaps-over-previous-figures/

Japan defends steps to end discrimination

In a new report to the United Nations, the government outlines the situation of ethnic minorities and foreign residents in Japan, claiming it has made “every conceivable” effort over the past several years to eliminate racial discrimination.

Occasionally sounding on the defensive, the report, released Friday, sidesteps the issue of a comprehensive law prohibiting discrimination between individuals.

Human rights groups and Doudou Diene, the U.N. special rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, have called for the passage of a law clearly against racism and xenophobia, as well as the establishment of an independent national human rights monitoring body.

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20080826a3.html

Helping hand for immigrants

Hope seen in plan to promote Japanese-language education, visas

Under the plan, the rights of immigrants, defined by the U.N. as people who live outside their home country more than 12 months, would be bolstered and efforts made to make life more convenient for them here.

Those already in Japan would receive the same benefits as those who hope to live in Japan.

Under the plan, a law banning racism would be enacted. The government would ensure immigrants receive the same public welfare services as Japanese do, encourage universities and vocational schools to accept more foreign students and strengthen Japanese-language education.

The conditions for granting foreigners permanent resident and long-term resident status would also be relaxed.

The plan still must be accepted by the ruling coalition and approved by the Cabinet.

If this happens, part of the plan that does not require legislative changes, including loosening conditions for permanent resident status, could take effect within a year, as Nakagawa proposed to the government.

Policies requiring new laws or revisions, such as an antiracism law, will have to clear the Diet. Sakanaka hopes the needed legislation will be enacted in three years.

Keiko Tanaka, director of the nonprofit organization Hamamatsu Foreign Children Education Support Association, praised the LDP members for the plan.

“Children are able to communicate in Japanese but have not reached the stage where they study subjects such as history and science in Japanese. That’s largely because they spend time in language classes, while other kids are pursuing those subjects,” Tanaka said.

Tanaka, whose NPO sends Japanese teachers to schools in Hamamatsu, hinted that schools may as well have poor-performing children repeat a grade, even though this is a rarity.

In addition to giving foreign children better educational opportunities, the plan would potentially give foreign workers more protection by making it easier to get permanent resident or long-term resident status, replacing the less-secure working visa.

Foreigners with working visas who are unemployed at the time they have to renew their visa are in theory illegal residents.

Louis Carlet, deputy general secretary of the National Union of General Workers Tokyo Nambu, said he wishes the plan had specifically done away with the current lump-sum pension payout that allows foreigners to recoup a fraction of the money they’ve paid into the system if they leave.

People have to pay pension premiums for 25 years to qualify for benefits when they turn 65. Foreigners who pay the premiums but leave Japan after working less than 25 years get a lump-sum amount, which increases proportionately up to only 36 months.

“The system basically means (Japan is) trying to send foreigners away in three years,” Carlet said.

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20080816f1.html

Foreign workers need social security

Opinion is firming in the government and the Liberal Democratic Party that Japan should more proactively accept workers from overseas.

This development comes against the backdrop of the business world facing increasingly serious labor shortages amid the accelerating globalization of markets and the rapid aging of society coupled with the chronically low birthrate.

Expansion of acceptance of foreign workers, however, cannot happen without what should be called Japan’s “internationalization from within,” or the installment of a set of arrangements benefiting foreigners working in Japan, including employment security, medical services and education.

A large number of foreigners under the system, however, are in fact employed as cheap, unskilled laborers, in violation of the law that bans employing foreigners in unskilled jobs in such sectors as textile and machinery manufacturing, where finding Japanese recruits is getting more and more difficult.

A survey by the Justice Ministry showed that the number of companies and other organizations that were found to be abusing their foreign employees under the “job-training” system, such as by failing to pay them due wages, stood at 449 throughout the country in 2007–an all-time high.

In the words of a 27-year-old Chinese man who came to Japan after applying to participate in the government-run job training system in 2005: “The promise of ‘job training’ is totally false.”

“I was forced to do a farming job from 5 in the morning through 10 at night every day, without any paid days off,” the man, who now lives in the Kanto region, said.

“My pay was a little more than 100,000 yen a month, and my employer banned me from using a cell phone and confiscated my passport,” he said. “I can’t afford to return home, as doing so before I finish the three-year period under the training system would mean that I’d forfeit the deposit, or guarantee money, that I managed to raise from my relatives.”

Ippei Torii, secretary general of Zentoitsu Workers Union, a Tokyo-based trade union, who has been tackling this problem for years, said: “Problems afflicting foreign workers have been worsening year by year. Many people are subject to such abuses as sexual harassment and having their wages illegally skimmed.”

A fact-finding survey conducted by the municipal government of Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Prefecture, where many foreigners of Japanese ancestry live, covering workers from South American countries in the city showed that 32 percent of the foreigners polled were not covered by any insurance for medical care.

Many of them, when asked why they were uninsured, cited such reasons as they could not afford to pay premiums and their employers did not allow them to have health care coverage, according to the survey.

Those not covered by medical insurance, must, of course, pay their medical bill in full if they fall ill or are injured.

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/20080813TDY04302.htm

DPJ may face backlash over suffrage issue

Democratic Party of Japan President Ichiro Ozawa’s pet project to give foreign permanent residents the right to vote in local elections is facing fierce opposition within the party.

The party has been discussing the issue through the vehicle of an advisory body. However, the discussion reached a stalemate, with both sides locked in a bitter confrontation. Some party members say it is likely that the party will postpone concluding the issue until after the next general election for the House of Representatives.

The DPJ has said that it would work to realize local suffrage for foreign permanent residents as part of the party’s basic policy formulated at the party’s founding in 1998.

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/20080812TDY02308.htm

An aging Japan slowly opens up to foreigners

Yanti Kartina left her family in Indonesia and joined 200 other nurses in moving to Japan, where a rapidly growing elderly population has created a desperate need for careers in old-age homes and hospitals.

The nurses, who are expected to learn Japanese and requalify as they work, are seen as an important test case as Japan struggles with the world’s fastest growing elderly population and a work force that is forecast to shrink, potentially devastating the economy.

“Japan is the first developed country to face this kind of population crisis,” said Hidenori Sakanaka, a former immigration bureau chief in Tokyo who now heads a research institute.

With more than a quarter of Japanese expected to be aged over 65 by 2015, the country faces serious economic consequences, including labor shortages that could weigh on the gross domestic product.

A group of governing party politicians see immigration as a possible solution and have presented Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda with a radical new proposal that seeks to have immigrants make up 10 percent of the population in 50 years’ time. Government figures show the work force is on course to shrink by eight million in the next 10 years.

If the necessary laws are passed, mass immigration could transform a country once so wary of foreigners that it excluded them almost entirely for more than 200 years until the 19th century.

“I don’t think there is any way forward but to accept immigrants,” Sakanaka said.

Even now, the idea of allowing in more foreigners is often described as a risk to Japan’s relatively crime-free and homogeneous society.

Many landlords refuse to rent apartments to foreigners and few Japanese employers offer immigrant workers the same rights as their Japanese colleagues. Less than 2 percent of Japan’s almost 128 million population are foreign-born.

Tetsufumi Yamakawa, chief economist at Goldman Sachs in Tokyo, believes that immigration, combined with efforts to draw more women and elderly people into the labor market, could lift growth above the annual 1 percent or less forecast by many analysts.

“I think this is very good timing to start thinking about this,” he said. “The decline is already in sight.”

The Indonesian nurses, who have been recruited to work in short-staffed hospitals and homes for the elderly, are the latest wave of controlled immigration. Government officials hope they will face fewer problems than their predecessors.

More than 300,000 Brazilian immigrants of Japanese descent have been a boon for Japan’s automotive and electronics factories, where many of them work. They have also helped the Brazilian economy by remitting $2.2 billion dollars home in 2005, according to the Inter-American Development Bank.

But in many ways, the Brazilians have failed to fit in even though they are the descendants of Japanese who left rural areas to start afresh in Latin America, mostly in the early 20th century.

Believing their heritage would give them an advantage in blending in, the Japanese government loosened conditions for working visas for them in 1990. The move was not entirely successful.

The Brazilians complain of discrimination and lack of schooling for their children, many of whom speak only Portuguese, while their Japanese neighbors are often shocked by their late-night parties and failure to conform to rules like trash recycling.

“They were just brought in and nothing was done to help them in terms of welfare,” said Hirohiko Nakamura, a lawmaker with the governing Liberal Democratic Party and a member of the committee that produced the new immigration report.

“Then people blame the foreigners for the problems, even though it’s Japan that invited them here and didn’t do anything for them,” he added.

The worst case, he says, are the tens of thousands of mostly Chinese workers allowed in on temporary “trainee” visas that allow them to work in menial jobs on farms and in factories.

That system has kept some small regional businesses ticking over, but reports of abuses like extremely low pay, sexual harassment and confiscated passports abound.

Many say that despite the desperate need for workers, Japan is setting hurdles too high for the latest batch of immigrants.

The Indonesian nurses and care workers will have only six months of Japanese study before starting full-time work. They must pass the relevant national examinations within three or four years while working as assistants, or be forced to return home.

Nakamura is optimistic about their chances, citing the example of some of the country’s highest profile immigrants.

“Look at the Mongolian sumo wrestlers,” he said. “They speak Japanese really well.”

But Sakanaka, the former immigration bureau chief, worried that the Indonesian nursing program would end in failure because of the complexity of the Japanese language and because he thought the rules had been made too strict.

“I think the system will turn out to be an embarrassment,” he said. “Almost nobody will pass and they will be told to go home.”

He advocates inviting in younger foreigners and allowing them to complete their training in Japanese before starting work.

On a broader basis, he and others say, opposition to immigration in Japan is less widespread than allegations of discrimination and exclusion would suggest.

http://www.iht.com/bin/printfriendly.php?id=15076481

Once a ‘gaijin,’ always a ‘gaijin’

Gaijin. It seems we hear the word every day. For some, it’s merely harmless shorthand for “gaikokujin” (foreigner). Even Wikipedia (that online wall for intellectual graffiti artists) had a section on “political correctness” that claimed illiterate and oversensitive Westerners had misunderstood the Japanese word.

I take a different view: Gaijin is not merely a word; it is an epithet ? about the billions of people who are not Japanese. It makes assumptions about them that go beyond nationality.

Let’s deal with the basic counterarguments: Calling gaijin a mere contraction of gaikokujin is not historically accurate. According to ancient texts and prewar dictionaries, gaijin (or “guwaijin” in the contemporary rendering) once referred to Japanese people too. Anyone not from your village, in-group etc., was one. It was a way of showing you don’t belong here ? even (according to my 1978 Kojien, Japan’s premier dictionary) “regarded as an enemy” (“tekishi”). Back then there were other (even more unsavory) words for foreigners anyway, so gaijin has a separate etymology from words specifically meaning “extra-national.”

Even if one argues that modern usage renders the two terms indistinguishable, gaijin is still a loaded word, easily abused.

For gaijin is essentially “n–ger” and should be likewise obsolesced.

Fortunately our media is helping out, long since adding gaijin to the list of “hoso kinshi yogo” (words unfit for broadcast).

So can we. Apply Japan’s slogan against undesirable social actions: “Shinai, sasenai” (“I won’t use it, I won’t let it be used.”).

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/fl20080805ad.html